
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
CONTACT: GEORGIA ECONOMOU |
April 7,
2004—No.24 |
(202)
785-8430 |
OP-ED BY AHI PRESIDENT PUBLISHED IN THE NATIONAL HERALD
WASHINGTON, DC—The following Op-Ed article by AHI President Gene Rossides appeared
in The National Herald on April 3, 2004, page 11.
The Annan Plan and the Rule of Law by Gene Rossides
The guiding principle for all the parties
to the Annan Plan negotiations for a Cyprus settlement should
be the Rule of Law.
The interested parties are not only the immediate
ones, the Greek and Turkish Cypriots, the guarantor powers, Britain,
Greece
and Turkey, and the United Nations, but also the United States
which caused the Cyprus tragedy of 1974 by the illegal actions
of Secretary
of State Henry Kissinger.
What does it mean to stand by the
rule of law?
It means what President Dwight D. Eisenhower stated
during the 1956 Suez Crisis when Britain, France and Israel
committed
aggression in late October by invading Egypt to gain control
of the Suez Canal.
In his memorable October 31, 1956 television and radio
report to the nation on the Middle East crisis he condemned that
invasion. President Eisenhower said:
"We believe these actions to have been taken in error, for we do not accept the
use of force as a wise or proper instrument for the settlement of
international disputes.
The present fact nonetheless seems clear.
The action taken
can scarcely be reconciled with the principles and purposes of
the United
Nations to which
we have all subscribed. And beyond this we are forced to doubt
that resort to force and war will for long serve the permanent interests
of the attacking
nations.
My fellow citizens, as I review the march of world events
in recent years I am ever more deeply convinced that the United
Nations represents
the soundest
hope for peace in the world. For this very reason I believe that
the
processes of the United Nations need further to be developed
and strengthened.
I speak particularly of increasing its ability
to secure justice under international law.
In all the recent troubles
in the Middle East there have, indeed, been injustices suffered
by all nations involved. But
I do not believe
that another
instrument of injustice—war—is a remedy for these wrongs.
There
can be no peace without law. And there can be no law if we were
to invoke one code of international
conduct
for
those
who oppose
us
and another
for our friends. (Emphasis added)
The peace we seek and need means much more than
mere absence of war. It means the acceptance of law and
the fostering
of justice
in all
the world.
To our principles guiding us in this quest
we must stand fast. In so doing we can honor the hopes of
all men
for a world
in which
peace will
truly
and justly reign."
Eisenhower succeeded in reversing the aggression
without firing a shot. He used diplomatic and economic
pressure and
the force of his
own stature.
Eisenhower would not have tolerated Turkey's aggression
one minute.
The rule of law also means "that aggression cannot and will not pay" as set forth by President George H.W. Bush and President Mikhail Gorbachev in
Helsinki on September 9, 1990 regarding Iraq's invasion
of Kuwait. Their historic joint statement read in part:
"We are united in the belief that Iraq's aggression must not be tolerated. No
peaceful international order is possible if larger states can devour their
smaller neighbors.
We are determined to see this aggression end,
and if the current steps fail to end it, we are prepared
to
consider additional
ones consistent
with
the U.N. Charter. We must demonstrate beyond any
doubt that aggression cannot and
will not pay."
When are we going to apply the Eisenhower
Doctrine to Turkey?
When are we going to apply the
Bush/Gorbachev Doctrine to Turkey?
The failure to apply the rule
of law to Turkey has seriously damaged U.S. interests and cost
the U.S. taxpayer
over 50 billion
dollars these
past decades.
The Annan Plan needs to be changed
to reflect the Eisenhower and Bush/Gorbachev Doctrines
in
the interests of all the parties.
Turkey must
be treated as any other aggressor nation would be treated. Applying
the rule of
law to the Annan
Plan to make
it democratic, workable,
financially viable and just will serve the
cause of peace and security in the region.
The
Greek Cypriots and Greece should stand by the rule of law as embodied
in the
Eisenhower and Bush/Gorbachev
Doctrines.
There
is
no downside
for them
to say "NO" to an Annan Plan which does not have the changes needed to make it democratic,
workable, financially viable and just.
On the contrary, standing for principle
would
enhance their prestige.
Lord Hanney, the
former British envoy to Cyprus, said that
not reaching
a resolution
by
May 1 was " not the end of the world" and that negotiations are available after May 1, 2004, when Cyprus becomes a
full member of the EU.
The Annan Plan as
presently written reduces the UN to an
errand boy for Britain,
the prime
drafter of
the Annan
Plan,
in
support of
the aggressor
Turkey.
Britain, which caused the original Cyprus
problem in the 1950's by its divide and
rule policy,
has substantial
economic
interests
in
Turkey and many Englishmen
have illegal title to Greek Cypriot properties
in northern occupied Cyprus.
The U.S. acquiescence to Britain's
actions makes a mockery of our efforts
to build democratic
institutions
in
Iraq, the
rest of the
Middle
East and elsewhere.
The U.S. should
follow the historic precedents set by Eisenhower
in the Suez
Crisis of 1956
and by Bush 41 regarding
the Iraq aggression
of 1990.
The
proper use of diplomatic and economic
pressure on Turkey could end Turkey's
aggression
and occupation in short
order.
President Bush, Secretary
Powell and Secretary Rumsfeld should
seek
the views of
persons other
than Under Secretary
of State Marc
Grossman, Deputy
Secretary
of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Under
Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith
and Richard
Perle, former
Defense
Advisory Board
member, who have
been the
prime movers
of a double standard and appeasement
of Turkey on aggression and the
rule of law,
and who have made false and misleading
statements
as to Turkey's reliability and
value as a strategic ally
of the
U.S. for
their own agendas. Former
Ambassadors Tom Boyatt and Monteagle
Stearns could give helpful insights
and advice
to them based on what is best for
the U.S.
Call and write the President,
202-456-1111 (the comment line),
Secretary of State Colin
Powell, 202-647-4000,
Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, 703-692-7100,
your Senators and Representatives,
202-224-3121, and urge them to
apply the rule of law to the
Annan Plan in the interests of the U.S.
You can make a
difference.
For additional information,
please contact Vivian Basdekis at (202) 785-8430 or at [email protected].
For general information
about
the activities
of AHI,
please see our Web site at http://www.ahiworld.org/.
Back to top
|